Same for the "online only design" argument. The moment they decide it's not viable anymore and they want to shut it down: what does it matter to them, what players do with it? As long as they offer the service themselves, no one is bugging them. (Although I would absolutely be in favor of also getting self hosting options right from the start, I am realist enough to accept, that this would indeed lower economical feasibility of some projects.)
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 408
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 408
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
I imagine it's rather licensing. If they have to provide the software at some point, they can't use components they are not allowed to distribute. And I agree, that this will impact development costs. But with the law in place, this is not an unexpected cost but one that can be factored in. Might be, that some live services are then no longer viable... but I don't care. There are more games than anyone could play and games are cancelled or not even started to develop all the time for various reasons. One more or less is just noise.