What I love about recent gaming news is how indie devs are getting the glory they deserve, and AAA live service slop is being rejected like it deserves.
What I don't love about it is that the only people getting punished are people who actually work on games.
I think people are seeing only the negatives in this merely because of the association with Altman's name and ignoring the potential benefits out of cynicism.
I don't know about what other people see, but I see negatives because it's associated with a billionaire.
If Taylor Swift put her name on it, my opinion would not change.
Billionaires don't build, they finance machines that extract value from human beings.
Actual scientists have been working on using CRISPR to fight hereditary disease in the US and around the world.
A new type of Android spyware that requires a password for uninstallation has been identified, making it increasingly difficult for victims to remove the malicious software from their devices.
The first sentence in the link that you linked.
So... you're technically right. It can be removed.
But not by the customer, unless they have an uncle who works at Samsung.
How much Rick Ashley would we have to upload to the dataset to give the AI an earworm?
Would that count as a virus?
Or would it be considered... a bug?