I don't think it is that simple. The people opposing the federal IDs do have a point.Why would you need a centralized ID and collection of your data if you never take a flight or enter a nuclear power plant?Distrusting the central government is part of US culture I guess, and seeing the current administration over there, this distrust might well be justified.So I understand the discussions it apparently kindled, despite coming from a country were centralized federal IDs are mandatory (and me being ok with that).
Unzählige Lehr-Trickfilme haben damals schiesslich anschaulich dargestellt, dass man nach einem Ambosstreffer auf den Kopf lediglich leicht angepisst aus einem Loch im Boden steigt!
For anyone as confused as me (OP's link let to a blank page for me, so no help there), I generated a brief summary of the Real ID Wikipedia article.
Regulations now in place still are less stringent as I know them to be for domestic flights, and ID regulations in general, in European countries, but I now know that in the US there has always been a broad resistance against mandatory ID's, mainly because of the implications on personal freedom and privacy.This probably also explains the somewhat heated comments in this thread.
Here is the summary:
The Real ID Act of 2005 is a federal law that establishes minimum security standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards in the United States. Passed in response to the 9/11 attacks, its primary purpose is to enhance national security by ensuring that identity documents used to access federal facilities, nuclear power plants, and board commercial airline flights are more secure and standardized.
The law:
Requires states to verify applicants' identity, Social Security number, legal status, and address using official documentation.
Mandates enhanced security features on IDs and digital storage of application documents.
Establishes electronic sharing of ID and driver history databases between states.
Requires IDs to display a standardized format, including a photograph, full name, date of birth, signature, and (as of recent updates) gender marker.
States must issue two versions of IDs:
1.) A Real ID-compliant version (marked with a star), valid for federal purposes.2.) A non-compliant version (with a disclaimer like "Not for Federal Use") — still usable for driving or local identification.
Enforcement was repeatedly delayed. The final phase began on May 7, 2025, with full enforcement slated for May 5, 2027.
All 50 states and U.S. territories are now certified as compliant. Starting in 2025, TSA began enforcing Real ID requirements at airport checkpoints.
I am also an engineer, so my kids have had contact with advanced IT equipment since early childhood and are quite proficient by now. :-)
We also have a Chromebook with touchscreen at home, mainly so they can comfortably use some Android apps in a controlled environment (the 9 yo doesn't yet have a smartphone of her own). Chromebooks in school are not really a thing here in Germany afaik.
Both kids have an account on our Linux desktop in our work/office room.This is set up with a special German DNS that provides age-group appropriate filtered hostlists ("jusprog").To integrate that I used dnsmasq, which lets me easily modify the filters if needed.
It's not perfect, as it could be easily circumvented, but we talk openly about it and I try to minimize severe restrictions, so they feel no need to tamper with it.The kids are sometimes a little annoyed when something new doesn't work directly, but know that this is the way that allows them to use the PC relative freely, so they are quite happy with the arrangement for now.
We also have a Linux Laptop and a tiny Mini-PC with Linux Mint attached to the TV, both of which they are only allowed to use with some supervision.
Edit:They have some games that can be used with their accounts (the usual, Luanti, Supertux, Tuxracer).The more complex Games are on a special account for which they don't have the password themselves, but have to ask for access.Older kid just got really involved in playing Oblivion, so proud! ;-)
I don't think it is that simple. The people opposing the federal IDs do have a point.Why would you need a centralized ID and collection of your data if you never take a flight or enter a nuclear power plant?Distrusting the central government is part of US culture I guess, and seeing the current administration over there, this distrust might well be justified.So I understand the discussions it apparently kindled, despite coming from a country were centralized federal IDs are mandatory (and me being ok with that).