No idea what they think about it themselves, but I (not a citizen of EU) would rather see Niederlanden out of this. In my classification Niederlanden is a more or less nice country (I'm talking about foreign politics, not weed), Belgium is shit and Luxembourg is small and I haven't heard about them anything. So the mix would inevitably be just shit.
Yes, and nothing is done regarding it. "Waiting until the problem goes away" is the path that the EU uses in this and most others situations. But what if it will not? Or what if will take too much time?
That would a facepalmish situation ever if Orban would be reelected this spring (and it is actually possible!)
Or maybe you should provide a TLDR section to interest people to read the article. Ethic problems aren't the most intriguing theme. Most of such texts are just whining without any rationale.
I know the real answer, but you won't like it: the world is an objective reality which is extremely difficult to change; ethics, on the other hand, is a set of arbitrary rules that can be changed in whatever way you need almost for free. Should I continue explaining?
Their permabans are not permanent. Use VPN. Or just wait a month or two. AND DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THE SAME SUBREDDITS. At least do not do it right from the start. That's important.
This kind of puzzle is very lazy for creators: just make the function more complicated and/or increase the amount of parameters and this makes the puzzle drastically more difficult.
The method of solving is just brute force. Boring. Uninspiring.
What about parliament? I'm sure we can find a few pedophiles (if they lack pedophiles, then they absolutely 100% sure have some corrupt bribe-demanders) there too. Is parliament rotten?
Our unwilling to produce and launch 1-2k of long range drones to Russia is infuriating.