Because politics is not limited to Left and Right, compressed down to it's minimum reasonable simplicity it is at least two dimensional. In mass media you see "Left" vs "Right" division, on Lemmy you see Lib Left vs Auth Right vs Center divisions, which are just as strong but largely suppressed by entrenched political interests especially in the US but also across the industrialized world where Lib Left has been suppressed by the capitalist political apparatus.
Note that most of the time when someone on the Fediverse decries "Liberals" they mean capitalist centrist in the "Neo-Liberal" mode. In some specific circumstances though you might see Auth Left criticizing Lib Left with the term, essentially insulting them by lumping them in with the Centrists. In other cases more in line with mass media you might see any Right position using the term against anyone center or left of center.
Essentially, Liberal has become a term only meaningful in context, and for that reason largely useless in common discourse. This is why the Political Compass is so useful a tool, situating political positions in their context, though of course it is flawed by being only two dimensional when actual political groups are very much multidimensional.
Well I should say Scuttlebut can facilitate peer relay messaging, it can also facilitate direct peer to peer messaging I'm which case yes the messages queue up until you connect.
There are different kinds of relay systems as well for different use cases, like direct private messaging relays that key all messages encrypted but pass messages whenever either peer checks the node, but also one client to private group messages which functions more like WhatsApp communities, Telegram channels, etc. There isn't exactly a "public open channel" system, but some groups broadcast their public keys widely so people can join them.
There are also other social functions, it has been built out quite a bit since I last checked in on it.
It uses asynchronous p2p relay through the network, users pass encrypted messages through to others until it hits the users with the key. Basically a mesh communications network.
King's Reign has been fun, deck builder Roguelike where you play soldier cards and they combo while marching left to right along a board with three lanes.
["While individual women have spoken out before about forced birth control, the practice is far more widespread and systematic than previously known, according to an AP investigation based on government statistics, state documents and interviews with 30 ex-detainees, family members and a former detention camp instructor. The campaign over the past four years in the far west region of Xinjiang is leading to what some experts are calling a form of “demographic genocide.”
To clarify, do I think the Uigers are being massacred at population scale? I don't know. Do I think they are having their culture forceably erradicated and medical population control forced on them, and intentional han population being moved into the region to make them into a population majority to take away any regional political or social influence the Uigers might have? Absolutely.
Many people said the same of Berlin, Hamburg, and other German cities while Jews were kept as slaves in factories and trained out to camps to be gassed. A nice looking city says nothing about the treatment of minorities. In fact many of the "nicest cities" in the world were built on the blood and bones of indigenous inhabitants.
Yes, it very much depends on the definition of Homo sapiens.
There is a strict genetic definition in which a set of defining genes constrain the species, in which case there was likely a first human, but there is every possibility that their first descendents didn't meet that definition and it took a few generations of back and forthing and natural selection for a consistent line of humans to exist.
On the other hand you could define the species based on social behavior, in which case the "first human" only arose in context of at least one other member of the species, and "Adam and Eve" or "Annie and Eve" or "Adam and Steve" scenario.
Then you go to what most agricultrually minded people think of as a "species", which is fetile interbreeding. In that case it seems like there never really was a separation between Homo sapiens and Homo erectus and Neanderthals, as there is now broadly accepted evidence of interbreeding long past the "differentiation" of the species, though social and territorial differences seem to have kept them from re-merging into a unified population.
If you are familiar with Azure there is the project PandaCap by @lizard_socks@lemmy.world which is a self-hosted reader for activity-pub, ATProtocol, RSS/Atom and integrated with DeviantArt and other art sites.
