The Rust community really pulled together and made sure that there are Rust alternatives to as many tools out there as possible.
Deliberately or not, with good appreciative intentions or not, I'm afraid you're perpetuating a myth here (a conspiracy theory even, in some "mentally challenged" circles).
Most tools are independently created by individuals, or very small independent teams of contributors. And being an "alternative written in rust" is rarely a goal in and of itself (or shouldn't be anyway).
The notion of a unified central "
<lang>
community" that is responsible for creating 100s of tools is both silly and fictitious.Talking about Rust itself as a good language with good tooling that allows individuals to create good tools, and contribute to a thriving library ecosystem, is okay. Not everything has to be a "community" or a "community effort" or framed that way, however.
The explicitness in that part of my comment was deliberate to fully dispel the "really pulled together and made sure" part from the well-meaning OP.