Server owners must apply an age-restricted label to any channels that contain sexually explicit content involving adults or content involving adults that is shared solely for the purposes of sexual gratification.
nothing else needs to be age-restricted, and age restriction of topics you mentioned would be big news for discord. pluralkit's home is discord and has great influence there, and the lgbtq+ community definitely has a larger presence than the plural community
Channels, servers, and commands set to age-restricted will be inaccessible
DM requests deemed "sensitive" will be inaccessible
"Sensitive content" will be blurred
Won't be able to become a speaker in "stage" channels, a special type where a few videoconferencers have a meeting where anyone else can watch and type but not videoconference; verified watchers can be invited to speak
DMs from unfamiliar users will be routed to a separate "warning"
ruling that California’s new law was unconstitutional because it did not impose the same requirements on all federal, state and local law enforcement officers.
However, the judge allowed the state to enforce a separate law that requires all law enforcement officers, including federal ones, to display visible identification.
that's more than one bit, though, which is part of the question's constraints. In practice that means [No response] would be the same as indicating 0 or even 1 and they cannot convey additional information by controlling for time of receipt, likely because they can't control time of receipt
Note that any organization may nominate anyone for its subject area's Nobel Prize. (In this case, the nominator is The Nation magazine.) I do hope this makes it to the shortlist.
Edit: Just fact-checked myself. There's stricter criteria and The Nation is claiming they have eligibility through relations with past Nobel (Peace) laureates, who are eligible.
None of these are the same thing. ICE List is a wiki, all the others are crowdsourced reports. This one is:
icemap aggregates both unstructured and structured data from a multitude of public online sources, then distills these data into useful news streams and figures. Currently, this vizualization pulls statistics and articles from ICE newsroom reports, TRAC immigration data, as well as a myriad of local and national news sources.
There's no problem with decentralization if the data used is all the same. In fact, it provides for a credible exit.
It would be just like the extant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library.
In the worst case we could just run Megalodon on all the archive.today URLs